Optimism pushes farmer sentiment index to all-time high | Western Livestock Journal
Home E-Edition Search Profile
Beef

Optimism pushes farmer sentiment index to all-time high

Purdue University Extension, CME Group
Mar. 10, 2020 3 minutes read
Optimism pushes farmer sentiment index to all-time high

February report released in early March.

Producers’ perception of improved current conditions in the agricultural economy pushed the Purdue University/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer to all-time record highs. The barometer rose to 168 in February, an increase of one point from January, and was up 18 points since December.

Last month’s increase was attributable to an improvement in the Index of Current Conditions, which rose 12 points from January to a reading of 154. Meanwhile, the Index of Future Expectations fell just 4 points below the record high set in January to a reading of 175. The Ag Economy Barometer is based on a mid-month survey (Feb. 10-14) of 400 U.S. agricultural producers.

“Almost across the board, producers indicated they were more optimistic about current conditions on their farms and in U.S. agriculture, and retained most of the improvement in future expectations exhibited in January,” said James Mintert, the barometer’s principal investigator and director of Purdue University’s Center for Commercial Agriculture. “Optimism about the agricultural trade outlook was underpinned by recent trade agreements and appeared to be the primary driver behind the improvement in sentiment.”

To understand whether U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and the China Phase One agreements impacted sentiment, producers were asked if the agreements relieved their concerns about the effect of tariffs on their farms’ income. Over three-fourths (76 percent) of respondents said the agreements either “somewhat” (69 percent) or “completely” (7 percent) relieved their concerns, while 17 percent chose “not at all” as their response.

[inline_image file=”2d68c8a25117202c56b567540737b444.jpg” caption=”Farmer Ted Flikkema and Peter Brown from the Gallatin Valley Land Trust worked together on the land conservation easement at the Flikkema farm.”]

Although some voiced concerns about the possible impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on agricultural trade in mid-February, when the survey was conducted, producers remained relatively optimistic about the resumption of trade with China. The percentage of producers expecting the soybean trade dispute to be settled soon, which peaked at 69 percent in January, declined to 61 percent in February; however, it was still the second most positive response since the question was first posed in March of 2019. Producers also remained optimistic that the trade dispute will be resolved in a way that’s favorable to U.S. agriculture, with 80 percent expecting an outcome that is ultimately positive for U.S. agriculture.

“As the COVID-19 virus footprint continues to expand, it remains to be seen whether it will impact farmer sentiment at home,” Mintert said.

Expectations for an improvement in farmland values also rose to an all-time high in February. When asked to look ahead five years, 59 percent of producers said they expect farmland values to rise, up from 50 percent in January. This was the most positive response to the question since data collection began in 2015. There also was a somewhat more optimistic outlook with respect to making large farm investments. The Farm Capital Investment Index rose from a reading of 68 in January to 72 in February.

The March 16 sign-up deadline for producers to make their program choice under the 2018 Farm Bill is looming. Last month’s survey focused on the program choice intentions of producers who grew soybeans in 2019. Four out of 10 (37 percent) said they were still uncertain regarding which program they would choose. Meanwhile, nearly 40 percent of respondents said they planned to choose the ARC-County program, the most popular program under the 2014 Farm Bill, followed by the Price Loss Coverage program at 19 percent, and the ARC-Individual Coverage program at 7 percent. — Purdue University, CME Group

Share this article

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read More

Read the latest digital edition of WLJ.

February 2, 2026

© Copyright 2026 Western Livestock Journal