The impact of dressing percent on cull cow marketing | Western Livestock Journal
Home E-Edition Search Profile
Markets

The impact of dressing percent on cull cow marketing

Oklahoma State University Extension
Nov. 06, 2017 2 minutes read
The impact of dressing percent on cull cow marketing

Oklahoma State University extention logo

Cull cows that are destined to go to the packing house are graded by their fleshiness. The fattest cows are called “Breakers.” Moderately-fleshed cows are “Boning Utility.” Thin cows are called “Leans” or “Lights,” depending upon the weight of the cow.

There will be price differences among these four grades. However, within each grade, large variation in prices per hundredweight will exist because of differences in dressing percentage. Cow buyers are particularly aware of the proportion of the purchased live weight that eventually becomes saleable product hanging on the rail. Dressing percentage is (mathematically) the carcass weight divided by the live weight multiplied by 100.

Key factors that affect dressing percentage include gut fill, udder size, mud and manure on the hide, excess leather on the body, and anything else that contributes to the live weight but will not add to the carcass weight.

Most USDA Market News reports for cull cows will give price ranges for High, Average, and Low Dressing Percents for each of the previous mentioned grades. As you study these price reports, note that the differences between High and Low Dressing cows and bulls will generally be greater than differences between grades. Many reports will indicate that Low Dressing cows will be discounted up to $8-10 per hundredweight compared to High Dressing cows and will be discounted $5-7 per hundredweight compared to Average Dressing cows. These price differences are usually widest for the thinner cow grades (Leans and Lights).

As producers market cull cows, they should be cautious about selling cows with excess fill. The large discounts due to low dressing percentage often will more than offset any advantage from the added weight. — Glenn Selk, Oklahoma State University emeritus extension animal scientist

Share this article

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read More

Read the latest digital edition of WLJ.

December 15, 2025

© Copyright 2025 Western Livestock Journal