Hay feeding losses occur primarily from trampling, refusal and leaf shatter. Some feeding loss is inevitable but can vary from as little as 2% to more than 50%. A study conducted by Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service found that feeding round bales in open-bottom hay rings reduced the amount of hay fed by 29% when compared to feeding round bales unprotected (13% loss vs. 42% loss).
If a 1,200-pound round bale costs $35, a 29% reduction in hay loss is equivalent to a $10.15 savings per bale. The hay savings from using a ring on 20 bales would pay for a round bale feeder that cost $200.
A more recent study by Oklahoma State University (OSU) assessed the efficacy of four types of hay ring feeders. Reported dry matter losses for the different rings were: poly rings (21%), open-bottom steel rings (20.5%), sheeted rings (12.6%) and modified cone feeders (5.3%). This data indicates that switching from an open-bottom ring to a modified cone feeder would result in a 15.2% reduction in dry matter loss.
With the same $35 per bale hay, that equates to a savings of $5.32 per bale. Cone feeders range in style and costs, but a popular model retails for $565. This indicates that after feeding 107 bales through the cone feeder it would pay for itself in hay savings.
If we compare the OSU modified cone data to the University of Arkansas data from using a no ring feeder, we could potentially realize a 36.7% reduction in dry matter loss by utilizing a feeder. This is a savings of $12.85 per bale at $35/bale hay value!
This decision to purchase a proven and efficient hay feeder design would only require 44 bales of fed hay to pay for the purchase. Round bale feeders are a wise investment when free-choice hay feeding is necessary. — Brian Pugh, OSU Cooperative Extension Service
