Resource Science: Forest fires, CO2 in harvested and regenerated trees  | Western Livestock Journal
Home E-Edition Search Profile
News

Resource Science: Forest fires, CO2 in harvested and regenerated trees 

Resource Science: Forest fires, CO2 in harvested and regenerated trees 

A wildfire raging through a forest.

Cole Barash

You are probably aware there is a lot of media attention, research and government policies regarding climate change, which is thought to be caused by greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane) from fossil fuels, livestock and forest fires. You might also have noticed an increase in wind and solar power facilities in the western states with the objective of reducing CO2 emissions from fossil fuels like coal.

Forest fires also produce large amounts of CO2, and it is common sense that reducing forest fires also reduces CO2 emissions, and prevents destruction of timber, wildlife and property. In previous WLJ articles (see the references), I described how timber harvest can prevent forests from burning and locks up CO2 in wood products and regenerates new trees. Trees convert CO2 in the atmosphere into wood cellulose, hemicellulos and lignin, and release CO2 when burned or decayed. The climate change term for locking up CO2 is carbon sequestration. Forests currently sequester 12.4% of the U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and good forest management can substantially increase this.

There are several benefits of managing forests with timber harvest (logging): forests don’t burn and emit CO2, CO2 is locked up in lumber and other wood products, wildlife habitat and livestock grazing can be improved, and local communities benefit from jobs and income. Foresters know how to manage forests to achieve these objectives but are often prevented from doing so by environmental regulations and lawsuits which stop timber harvests. A well-known example is the Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing of the northern spotted owl which stopped timber harvest and devastated the timber industry in the Pacific Northwest. Readers of the WLJ are familiar with similar environmental regulations and lawsuits trying to stop livestock grazing.

I calculated the amount of CO2 (called CO2 equivalents by climate scientists) that could be locked up in harvested wood products and in regenerating trees after harvest. I estimated tons of CO2 in wood products and regenerating trees by converting the volume (board feet) of green wood to weight in tons, minus the weight of the water content of green wood, times the proportion of wood that is carbon, plus the weight of the oxygen combined with the weight of the tree carbon to form CO2 (see the references).

You can see in the table that about 200 to 250 tons of CO2 per acre of forest can be locked up in harvested wood products. Another 123 tons of CO2 per acre can be locked up in new tree regeneration after about 60 years. So, harvest followed by regenerating trees can lock up about 325 to 375 tons of CO2 per acre. The table also shows that the five-year average (2019-23) timber harvest in just one state, Montana, was 334.4 million board feet which represents about 2.2 million tons of CO2 per year. See the references for the information in the table.

Amount of CO2 in harvested and regenerating trees.
Tree species and location
CO2 (tons/acre)Age (years)Height (feet)
Lodgepole pine, Gallatin Co., MT21110260
Harvested (calculated from measured trees)
Douglas fir, Pacific Northwest24210080
Harvested (calculated from forest data)
Grand fir, Douglas fir, western white1236070
pine; inland Pacific Northwest
Regenerating trees (calculated from forest data)
CO2 tons/year
Douglas fir, lodgepole pine, other conifer species2,245,614 tons CO2/year
Calculated from Harvested timber dataCO2/year calculated from 334,362,600 board feet of timber

These are general estimates because the amount of CO2 in trees will vary considerably depending on the tree species, age and location. Some forests will have more CO2 per acre and other forests will have less. The point is that timber harvest followed by regeneration of new trees will result in more sequestration of CO2 and less CO2 emissions compared to untreated forests that might burn. Timber harvest is a basic objective of forest management, as recognized by the American Loggers Council and the U.S. Forest Service who agree that logging is an effective tool for reducing hazardous fuels and achieving forest management goals.

It is remarkable that forests in the U.S. currently absorb about 12.4% of the total GHG emissions in the U.S. Trees actually remove CO2 from the atmosphere while forest fires emit large amounts of CO2. It is obvious that preventing large forest fires can reduce the amount of CO2 emissions, and timber harvest and regeneration of trees can too. Common sense forest management should be implemented on a large scale to reduce the damage done by forest fires, increase the productivity of our forests, and improve rural economies. — Dr. Matt Cronin

(Matthew Cronin is a scientist at Northwest Biology & Forestry Co. and a teaching professor at Montana State University, Bozeman. He was a research professor at the University of Alaska.)

References and notes

Note: The amount of CO2 (tons)in harvested and regenerating trees is calculated with a conversion of 6.1 tons of green wood per thousand board feet; minus the weight of the water content of green wood (0.4 times green wood weight); times the fraction of wood that is carbon (0.5 times the dry wood weight); plus the weight of the oxygen combined with the weight of the tree carbon to form CO2 (3.67 times the weight of carbon in the tree).

WLJ articles on Forests, fires, logging, and climate change:

June 17, 2022 Resource Science: Timber and fire | Top Headlines | wlj.net

November 11, 2022 Resource Science: Logging, forest fires and greenhouse gas emissions | Resource Science | wlj.net

December 22, 2023 Resource Science: A new category of forests – Old growth | Resource Science | wlj.net

August 9, 2024 Resource Science: Forests and climate change | | wlj.net

October 16, 2024 Resource Science: How much CO2 is in trees? | Western Livestock Journal

Forestry references

University of Montana Bureau of Business and Economic Research 2025. Montana State timber harvest total 2019 to 2023. Bureau of Business and Economic Research.

Memorandum of Understanding Between the American Loggers Council and the USDA, Forest Service. July 2024. American Loggers Council Signs Historic Memorandum of Understanding with the USDA Forest Service — American Loggers Council I The National Voice for Loggers (amloggers.com) 

Kolb, P. 2024. Forest resilience, restoration, and collaboration. Montana State University Extension Forestry.

Mann, C.N. and H.H. Lysons. 1972. A method of estimating log weights. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper PNW-138, Portland, Oregon. 

Stage, A.R, D.L. Renner, and R.C. Chapman. 1988. Select yield tables for plantations and natural stands in inland Northwest forests. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper INT-394, November 1988.

Brown, J.K., J.A. Kendall Snell, and D.L. Bunnell. 1977. Handbook for predicting slash weight of western conifers. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-37, July, 1977. Ogden, Utah. 

McArdle, R.E., W.H. Meyer, and D. Bruce. 1930, revised 1949 and 1961. The yield of Douglas fir in the Pacific Northwest. USDA Technical Bulletin No. 201.

Domke et al. 2023. Greenhouse gas emissions and removals from forest land, woodlands, urban trees, and harvested wood products in the United States, 1990-2021. Resource Bulletin WO-101. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 10 p. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals From Forest Land, Woodlands, Urban Trees, and Harvested Wood Products in the United States, 1990–2021 (usda.gov)

U.S. Forest Service. 2021. FS-1189c | December 2021. Forest Carbon Status and Trends. R&D Hot Topic: Forest Carbon Status and Trends (usda.gov) 

EPA 2023. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2019 – Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry (epa.gov) 

Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes | Nature Climate Change 

Environment: How much carbon do forests absorb? | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) 

Forests Endure as Carbon Sink Despite Regional Pressures | US Forest Service Research and Development (usda.gov) 

The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It’s Actually a Lot More Complicated | Smithsonian (smithsonianmag.com) 

Wood Species – Moisture Content and Weight (engineeringtoolbox.com) 

Wood and Moisture | The Wood Database (wood-database.com) 

Assessment of moisture content profile in Douglas-fir wood using electrical resistivity-based tomography – ScienceDirect 

Calculating the Carbon Stored in Wood Products – WoodWorks | Wood Products Council 

FTM: The Fire and Tree Mortality Database | US Forest Service Research and Development (usda.gov) 

Share this article

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment

    Read More

    Read the latest digital edition of WLJ.

    December 15, 2025

    © Copyright 2025 Western Livestock Journal