Let’s dig deeper into the COF report | Western Livestock Journal
Home E-Edition Search Profile
Policy

Let’s dig deeper into the COF report

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension
Oct. 03, 2017 3 minutes read
Let’s dig deeper into the COF report

Texas AM AgriLife Extension logo

Feedlot placements bucked seasonal trends in July by declining, but rebounded in August, according to USDA’s most recent Cattle on Feed report (Sept. 22). Placements were reported up 2.6 percent over a year ago. The 1.93 million head placed were the most for an August since 2012.

While the average pre-report estimates were for placements to be below a year ago, a 2.6 percent increase was within the range of estimates. It’s also interesting to note that the range of pre-report placement estimates was large, about 16 percentage points, reflecting a lot of uncertainty prior to this report. That uncertainty reflected regional placement patterns, red ink in recent closeouts, drought in the Northern Plains, but abundant grass likely holding calves in other regions. All in all, this report was likely a surprise for some market participants.

The distribution of placements by weight was, perhaps, the most interesting part of the report. All of the increase in placements was in the 800-899 (up 50,000 head) and the 900-999-lb. category (up 15,000 head). That 65,000-head increase in placements was slightly offset by lower placements in the 600-699, 700-799, and +1,000-lb. categories.

Digging in a little deeper suggests more evidence of cattle numbers pushing on-feed inventories to reflect older seasonal patterns. It is normal for August placements to exceed those in July. Most years during this decade that month-to-month increase has been around 100,000 head.

This year’s increase from July was 313,000 head, slightly larger than last year’s 307,000 head and the largest July to August increase since 2010. In the decade of the 2000s it was not uncommon to have over a 400,000-head increase in placements over the July to August period.

Before everyone freaks out about placements being above the average expectation, a little perspective is in order.

Total placements were 49,000 head above August 2016. That’s not a large number compared to total placements of 1.9 million. The 65,000-head increase in the heavier categories marketed over a likely two-month period is about 1,500 head per day, likely early in 2018, with maybe a few in late 2017. And remember, marketings exceeded placements in August for the first time since 2013, pulling down on-feed inventories. Feedlot marketings continued at their rapid pace, up 6 percent, which is preventing backed up supplies.

Cattle on feed were reported up 3.6 percent. It’s likely that if a year ago we would have said that cattle on feed would be up about 3.6 percent in mid-late 2017 most would have said “that seems about right.” The on-feed number is not really out of line with longer-term trends in cow herd and calf crop estimates. It is fair to say that USDA’s rounding of the placement and on-feed numbers in the report makes the headline numbers seem more alarming. On-feed up 4 percent seems a lot worse than 3.6 percent.

Fed cattle sold at about $108 during the week of the report, up $2 from the week before. It’s worth remembering also that current prices reflect the current market. The cattle on feed report contains information about market affecting supplies that will affect prices some months down the road. If anything, there is some fundamental market information that would suggest $108 fed cattle might be underpriced. — David P. Anderson, professor and extension economist, Texas A&M University

Share this article

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read More

Read the latest digital edition of WLJ.

December 15, 2025

© Copyright 2025 Western Livestock Journal