Grazing native grass pastures is more economical | Western Livestock Journal
Home E-Edition Search Profile
Livestock

Grazing native grass pastures is more economical

Grazing native grass pastures is more economical

Grazing native grass pastures is more economical - 1

It is typically reported that cow winter supplementation accounts for 40 to 60 percent of the total annual cost of maintaining a cow, but that cost depends greatly on whether hay is being supplemented in lieu of dormant standing forage for the cow. When you can supply standing forage in the form of native grass pasture instead of a bale of hay, the total winter feed cost will be dramatically reduced.

We will compare four different feeding scenarios:

Native grass and byproduct feed ($210 per ton, 14.4 percent crude protein (CP), 74.4 percent total digestible nutrients (TDN);

Native grass and 20 percent range cubes ($250 per ton, 20 percent CP, 74 percent TDN);

Native grass and 38 percent range cubes ($350 per ton, 38 percent CP, 70 percent TDN); and

Hay feeding plus supplementation (hay quality 8 percent CP, 50 percent TDN, supplement with 20 percent range cubes).

Winter hay substitution comes at a cost

For many producers, it is not uncommon to incur four or five months of hay feeding during the winter. When fed average-quality forage, a 1,200-pound cow will consume about 2.5 percent of her body weight daily. That equates to 900 pounds of forage monthly, roughly equivalent to the weight of the average bale of hay. This does not include hay wasted in storage or during feeding. Thus, four to five bales of hay could be required per cow for the winter-feeding period.

At a typical cost of $45 per bale, the cost of winter hay substitution alone accounts for $180 (for four months) to $225 (for five months) per cow. Add to this the cost of additional feed supplementation, if the hay is not high enough quality to meet the cow’s nutritional requirements. If using average quality hay (8 percent CP and 50 percent TDN), feeding 20 percent protein range cubes ($250 per ton) as a supplement would add $46 to the per-cow feed costs. The total winter-feeding cost if using hay, therefore, would likely range between $224 and $269 per cow.

However, there are other options of maintaining a cow through the winter that are more cost-effective. Using native grass (NG) as a stockpiled, standing hay crop is one of the most cost-effective methods of overwintering the cow herd.

Winter programs for spring-calving cows

Using a few basic assumptions for the quality of the native grass pasture, we can start to build a winter supplementation program for spring-calving cows. The first assumption is that mid-March will be the average calving date for the herd. The second assumption is the forage quantity is not limited, but quality will diminish from 5 to 4 percent CP and 55 to 49 percent TDN during the winter.

Scenario 4 demonstrates that all supplemental feed costs while grazing winter-dormant native grass pastures are well below the $224 to $269 total cost of feeding hay plus supplementation. Additionally, feeding scenarios 1 through 3 demonstrate that the most economical feed on a cost-per-ton basis is not always the right feed to purchase. In this case, scenario 3 has the highest cost per ton of feed but will deliver the most economical annual winter-feeding cost on a per-head basis.

Knowing when the average of the cow herd will calve can help you determine the supplementation strategy that best fits your operation. Thus, a well-defined, concise calving season helps to improve profitability by reducing winter-feeding costs.

Remember, cows don’t necessarily care about quality (percentage of CP or TDN) of the feed as much as they do the total physical amount of feed that they receive. Nutritional requirements can be met with lower amounts of more nutrient-dense feeds. Many times, the cow is most limited by energy, so it is also important to know the TDN content of the feed. This is a question that will have to be asked since the feed tag does not give enough information to effectively determine energy content. — Robert Wells, Noble Research Institute livestock consultant

Share this article

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read More

Read the latest digital edition of WLJ.

February 2, 2026

© Copyright 2026 Western Livestock Journal