Court denies USDA motion to dismiss lawsuit over EID | Western Livestock Journal
Home E-Edition Search Profile
News

Court denies USDA motion to dismiss lawsuit over EID

Court denies USDA motion to dismiss lawsuit over EID

A yellow RFID tag is located in a steer’s ear.

A legal challenge to a USDA mandate requiring electronic identification (EID) tags for certain beef cattle, bison and dairy cows moving across state lines will continue after a federal judge on Sept. 30 denied a USDA motion to dismiss the case brought on behalf of cattle producers.

The rule that took effect on Nov. 5, 2024, requires visibly readable EID tags for sexually intact cattle and bison 18 months or older, dairy cattle of any age, and cattle and bison of any age used for rodeos, shows or exhibitions.

The New Civil Liberties Alliance filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, on behalf of the Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF USA), the South Dakota Stockgrowers Alliance and the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance, as well as individual producers.

The federal court also dismissed one of the counts alleged by the plaintiffs—that the mandate was beyond USDA’s statutory power. Also allowed to stand are the plaintiffs’ allegation that the final rule was arbitrary and capricious.

USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) provide EID tags for free through state veterinarian offices.

The lawsuit is seeking the vacation of the rule in its entirety and to permanently block its enforcement.

Though APHIS has funded EID tags so far, the judge expressed skepticism that such funding would continue. USDA has argued that APHIS would continue to provide funding. USDA has estimated the number of cattle affected by the rule would be about 11 million head per year.

In its ruling, the court was skeptical that such APHIS funding is long-term and at some point, producers could shoulder more of a financial burden to meet the mandate.

“To this end they assert that plaintiffs have not established ‘that they stand to incur actual and imminent financial costs in order to comply with the rule,’” the court said in the ruling.

“Plaintiffs, however, throughout their amended complaint allege that certain individuals have paid money for EID tags and that the financial burden on most cattle herds will be anywhere from $50 to $2,000. Additionally, the final rule states that APHIS cannot commit to long-term funding for EID tags because the availability of federal funding in future fiscal years is dependent on annual congressional appropriations and USDA-APHIS budgetary priorities.”

As a result of the ruling, the case now moves to the summary judgement stage, according to the ruling.

EID tags are printed with a unique 15-digit number. USDA has said the rule will help producers by making it easier to track animals during an animal disease outbreak.

“Since the rule came into effect almost a year ago, America’s ranchers and farmers have been forced to comply with its expensive and unnecessary EID mandate,” said Kara Rollins, litigation counsel for the alliance.

“The rule is a classic example of bureaucratic convenience overriding reasoned decision making. We look forward to having this case resolved on the merits.” — Todd Neeley, DTN environmental editor

Share this article

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment

  1. yanceybl
    October 4, 2025
    Who pushed EID tags? AVMA and veterinarians. Electronic scanners make the Vet's job easier. Cost is more than EID tag. About 89% of cattle herds average 45-50 head. These cattle owners may not have facilities of equipment to handle tagging and animal. Either hire it done or pay sale barn to install tag. Long term, USDA wants EID tags from birth to death. Having seen a proposal from USDA/NCBA to help a 70 year old rancher tag a calf while the cow is trying to protect it. No need for EIDs

Read More

Read the latest digital edition of WLJ.

February 2, 2026

© Copyright 2026 Western Livestock Journal