Breeding is the cornerstone of a cow-calf program. But how many producers maximize the value of their calves with a controlled breeding program? A recent National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) study of U.S. cow-calf producers shows room for improvement.
Breeding a beef cow herd and marketing calves are two sides of the same coin. When and how you manage the breeding season affects the weight and number of calves you have to sell at a given time. If your best marketing opportunity is a certain sale, such as a feeder calf sale, or at a certain time of the year, better prices will be received for having uniform groups of calves.
Groups of uniformly-sized calves are the result of a short, defined calving season because the breeding season was short and effective. A short calving season enables a producer to concentrate his or her management efforts during calving and manage brood cows as a group with similar nutrient needs.
Many cow-calf producers plan to calve in the spring, corresponding with rapid growth of pasture forages. Brood cows turn that grazed forage into milk for their calves which creates efficient calf weight gain. In fact, according to the NAHMS study conducted in 2017, 56 percent of calves were born in the months of February through April (Figure 1).
[inline_image file=”95da691980b72e350d77e224443524cb.jpg” caption=”Figure 1. Monthly distribution of beef calf births. (NAHMS, 2017)”]
If it is true that a seasonal approach is the most cost effective, then it makes sense to capitalize on it by concentrating births within the season rather than spreading them out. Yet, the NAHMS study showed that less than half (46 percent) of beef cow-calf farms and ranches had calvings limited to three or fewer months. On the other hand, almost 28 percent of farms had calves born in six or more months of the year.
The 2017 NAHMS study, published in May 2020, surveyed cow-calf producers in 24 states that represent 80 percent of all U.S. cow-calf businesses. Farmers and ranchers in states in the east, central, and west participated, yielding data from 2013 U.S. beef cow-calf operations.
The study revealed that 77 percent of heifers were bred using natural service only and 15 percent of heifers were bred by a combination of bulls and artificial insemination (AI). However, cows were almost all (93 percent) bred by natural service only, with 5.5 percent bred with a combination of natural service and AI. The small remainders in each group are the heifers (3.4 percent) and cows (1.0 percent) bred only through AI.
A short calving season (< 120 days) is the result of a controlled breeding season. However, for the purposes of this study, a controlled breeding season was defined as removing bulls for a period of at least 30 days. Responses to the survey showed that most herds, 58 percent, did not have a controlled breeding season and 42 percent of cows were in herds with no defined breeding season. It is not surprising then that calves were born in all seasons of the year on many farms.
To better understand what cow-calf producers do relative to their breeding program, NAHMS investigated reproductive practices and technologies used on farms. In this, as well as in other measures, they cross referenced the size of the operation. Three sizes were defined; small: 1-49 cows, medium: 50-199 cows, and large: > 200 cows. The practices/technologies that were considered were estrus synchronization, AI, pregnancy diagnosis by palpation, blood test, or ultrasound, pelvic measurement, body condition scoring, semen evaluation (part of a breeding soundness exam) and embryo transfer (Figure 2).
[inline_image file=”414240894eacbae64ca66f9347046708.jpg” caption=”Figure 2. Adoption rate of reproductive practices/technologies by U.S. cow-calf producers. (NAHMS, 2017)”]
The percentage of all producers surveyed who do any individual one of these practices is very low (< 20 percent). For example, 19.7 percent of producers did semen evaluation, 13.6 percent body condition scored cows, 11.6 percent used AI. Some producers will have adopted more than one of these practices, but only 38 percent of all producers (all regions, all sizes) did any of the listed practices.
Yet, most of the practices/technologies can be done by the producer him or herself when trained. Estrus synchronization, AI, blood draw for pregnancy diagnosis, body condition scoring, and pelvic measurement do not require a veterinarian and can be done routinely on-farm.
Large cow-calf producers (> 200 cows) were more likely to adopt these practices, resulting in more than half of them doing palpation and semen evaluation and 78 percent doing at least one of the practices.
Better marketing with improved prices is dependent on increasing the management of breeding. Take stock of what is going on in your herd. Use the record of calvings as your baseline to improve upon. Plan now how you can tighten the breeding season, getting as many cows and heifers bred as early in the season as possible.
A breeding soundness exam is an important component in natural service herds. Having the bull capacity to cover the herd within a few weeks is better than having to depend on months to get some animals bred. Synchronizing cattle for estrus can be used to improve breeding season efficiency whether breeding is natural or by AI.
When vaccinating or handling cattle in the summer, consider drawing a blood sample for pregnancy diagnosis or having a veterinarian palpate the dam. Diagnosing pregnancy early (any time after 30 days serviced for the blood test), enables you to make better decisions about what to do with that cow or heifer.
These are starting areas for improving your breeding program; for taking control of it. When you take control of breeding, you are making a conscious effort to produce better calves and receive better prices. — Phil Durst, Michigan State University Extension
