U.S. policy is hypocritical
Dear Pete,
It was good to have a visit with you again in early February; I always
look forward to reading and reviewing your paper with an eye to keeping
up with what is going on in the industry. My response is based on what I
found offensive, and laughable, in the March 10th article by Tait
Berlier on “Texas blocks the flow of Canadian cattle.” Let me preface my
remarks by saying that when the dust settles from the BSE debacle, it
will turn out to be one of the most costly political scaremongering
antics of all time in our industry. All countries involved in this
charade have behaved irresponsibly. Australia is the only country that
handled the risk analysis intelligently and adequately; they, of course,
subsequently took advantage of the situation in North America by
whipping up food safety concerns in Asia at the expense of North
America. BSE is not a food safety issue; and when the proper
interventions are followed (removal of SRM’s), the risk of transmission
becomes extremely low.
When Texas AG Commissioner Todd Staples says he is disappointed with
Canada for signing a protocol inconsistent with international standards
and it is paramount to ensure trade decisions are based on sound
science, not political science, I laughed out loud! What an incredibly
hypocritical statement and position to take; he need only to have looked
in the mirror to find the nearest country guilty of that. Surely your
reporter and your magazine should understand the history of the trading
relationship between Canada and Mexico better than reiterating this
holier than thou perspective. Mexico has been willing to go ahead and
move towards normalizing trade for nearly three years with Canada, but
has been held in check by the U.S. threatening to close the border to
Mexican cattle if they went ahead and did this. Do you think there was
any sound science behind that position?
When the reporter quotes numerous producer groups being opposed to these
shipments, and supporting the Texas Department of Agriculture on this
decision, perhaps it should be noted that Mr. Kiker and Mr. McDonnell
have been part of the R-CALF group which has had a very protectionist
attitude for some time. This group has not been intelligent enough to
understand the potential damage they are doing to the cattle industry as
a whole and the American position worldwide, nor do they comprehend the
bigger picture on the advantages of free trade. I know each of them will
trot out the stats that Canada has had more cases of BSE, but let’s not
be absurd; we all know the sordid story of the last couple of months and
the black eyes the industry has received because of poor judgment. The
template for how this animal disease got a foothold in North America is
the same on both sides of the border; let’s try to be honest about it.
As one of many Canadians trying to find opportunities to make money in
this industry by feeding across the border, I am concerned that our
industry collectively continues to struggle unnecessarily by shooting
ourselves in the foot. On our tour through various feeding facilities
(in three states) in early February, it is obvious that there is an
advantage in the feeding sector south of the 49th parallel at the
moment; that is why we are doing business there. There has been, and
will continue to be, millions of dollars of business generated by both
Mexican and Canadian cattle in the U.S. Our industry faces huge
challenges with feed costs, regulation as well as access to our former
markets as well as new lucrative ones. I find it incredible that we can
keep stoking the fires with political rhetoric and still step back and
accuse others of the same thing. There is enough blame in this fiasco
for everyone to share equally; let’s move ahead and create demand for
our product!
Best regards,
Larry Sears
Flying E Ranche
Stavely, AB