On feed numbers support late 2007/early 2008 expectations
— Cattle on feed numbers total 10.3 million head, down 6 percent
from 2006.
— Placements drop 7.5 percent.
— Marketings, even with last year, remain
a blemish in an otherwise bullish report.
The Sept. 1 cattle on feed report contained more good news for cattle
feeders and cow/calf producers. On feed and placement numbers were
inline with analyst’s pre-report expectations. As expected, it was the
third consecutive month showing lighter placements and tighter fed
cattle supplies ahead, paving the way for strong markets well into next
year.
The number of cattle on feed totaled 10.3 million head on Sept. 1, 2007.
The inventory was 6 percent below the same date last year, but 3 percent
above Sept. 1, 2005.
“Looking inside the numbers, it’s clear inventories are down in nearly
all the major cattle feeding states from a year ago,” American Farm
Bureau Federation Livestock Economist Jim Sartwelle said.
“We witnessed a none-too-subtle shift in feeder cattle placements from
the south Plains to Nebraska, South Dakota and Iowa last fall and
winter,” Sartwelle said. “This was in response to increased corn prices
and the attraction of ample supplies of ethanol co-products in those key
corn-growing states to the fed cattle sector.”
As with each report this year, the trend in cattle feeding continues to
show a shift toward the northern Plains, with on feed numbers in Iowa
and South Dakota climbing 8 percent and 13 percent higher, respectively,
than September 2006 counts. Meanwhile, on feed numbers in Texas dropped
7 percent and feedlot numbers in Kansas declined 10 percent, while
Colorado on feed number were down 10 percent. In Idaho, on feed numbers
dropped 13 percent, likely as a result of Tyson’s plant closure there
last year which has meant cattle must be trucked farther for processing,
reducing the incentive to feed in the region.
However, despite the migration toward northern states, Sartwelle said
there is reason to believe that trend may not hold up in the future.
“As the year has worn on, some of the advantages in Nebraska, South
Dakota and Iowa have fallen prey to cyclically reduced feeder cattle
supplies,” he said. That’s because in August, only South Dakota and
Arizona saw feeder cattle placements above 2006 levels, with numbers up
23 percent and 20 percent, respectively, Sartwelle said. “In addition,
although cash corn prices decreased markedly through the summer, the
stigma surrounding placing lighter weight cattle remains.”
Placements in feedlots during August totaled 2.12 million, 7 percent
below 2006 but 6 percent above 2005. Net placements were 2.07 million.
During August, placements of cattle and calves weighing less than 600
pounds were 490,000, 600-699 pounds were 440,000, 700-799 pounds were
549,000, and 800 pounds and greater were 640,000.
“During August 2007, placements of cattle that weighed between 600
pounds and 799 pounds actually increased relative to 2006, but the
drop—by 190,000 head—in cattle weighing less than 600 pounds more than
made up for those modest increases. We are unsure how much of this loss
is due to projected costs of gain for 500-pound calves and how much is
due to there just not being many 500-pound calves available during
August,” Sartwelle said.
HedgersEdge.com market analyst Andy Gottschalk agreed with Sartwelle’s
comments on the stigma surrounding lightweight calves and went one step
farther in his analysis, saying that the drop in calf value, as a
result, has created a potential opportunity for profits.
“Calf prices continue to weaken relative to the price of feeders and fed
value. Versus feeders, calves are trading at their lowest level since
September 2003,” Gottschalk said. “This condition creates an opportunity
to swap from that which is ‘overpriced’ (feeders) to that which is
‘underpriced’ (calves),” he said.
Gottschalk offered the following example:
“If calves are placed in a grow yard, significant profits are available.
Using a cost of gain of $60 per cwt., a 550 pound steer calf grown to
750 pounds would require a selling price of $134 or greater to allow
only a breakeven, versus the January feeder futures currently trading at
$114.50. Any price under $134 for 550 pound steer calves would capture
additional profits to the producer, if those cattle were grown to 750
pounds,” he said.
“Under a similar scenario, a 450 pound
steer calf grown to 700 pounds would benefit if the selling price
received for the steer calf was less than $144 per cwt.”
In terms of fed cattle marketings, many analysts attributed the
lackluster number to multiple factors. Among the most commonly cited
reasons was the significant premium offered by October cattle contracts
over August on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, giving cattle feeders
reason to hold cattle over. However, the result was record carcass
weights for this time of year.
“Carcass weights continue to raise a caution flag, which should
encourage more aggressive marketings of fed cattle,” said Gottschalk.
“This industry must still market though May Placements, which were
sharply above April and prior year levels.”
He said the overall effect of slow marketings in August is likely to be
offset by the tight supplies during the fourth quarter of 2007. However,
Gottschalk cautioned that demand is going to be the primary driver of
fed cattle prices, rather than supply.
“We are convinced that our price forecast of a $97 fourth quarter high
is likely to be exceeded. We would not rule out a run at $100 as fed
cattle supplies tighten during the November- December time frame,” he
said. — John Robinson, WLJ Editor
Read more








